What level of control can be used to manage situations involving active aggression or when lower forms may fail?

The choice of Hard-Empty Hand Control as the appropriate level of control in situations involving active aggression or when lower forms may fail is grounded in the tactics employed in pressure point control and self-defense scenarios. Hard-Empty Hand Control encompasses techniques that allow an officer to establish compliance and protect themselves or others when individuals display aggressive behavior that cannot be resolved using softer techniques.

In situations of active aggression, using Soft-Empty Hand Control may not be effective, as it relies on de-escalation and gentler techniques that aim to gain compliance without significant force. Officer Presence, while important for deterrence, does not involve physical intervention and may not suffice when faced with an immediate threat. Similarly, the use of Deadly Force is not justified unless there is an imminent threat to life and is considered a last resort. Hard-Empty Hand Control bridges the gap by providing a way to counter aggression with effective techniques that prioritize officer safety while also allowing for control over the subject without resorting to deadly measures.