Which control theory allows for a variety of tools to effectively manage resistance levels?

Total Control Theory is the correct choice because it provides a comprehensive framework that encompasses various techniques and strategies for managing different levels of resistance encountered during confrontational encounters. This theory emphasizes the importance of adaptability and versatility in application, allowing officers to assess the level of resistance they face and select the most appropriate response from a variety of tools at their disposal.

This adaptability is crucial in dynamic situations where an individual’s resistance can fluctuate, and maintaining a range of response options enables officers to de-escalate situations effectively while ensuring their own safety and that of others. Thus, Total Control Theory supports the efficient and effective application of force, tailored to the circumstances at hand.

In contrast, other theories mentioned do not provide the same breadth of options or focus on the adaptability required to address varying resistance levels. For instance, One-Plus-One Theory typically discusses using one level of force above the resistance being exhibited, which may not encompass a broad range of response tools. The Resistance Control Model primarily categorizes types of resistance rather than offering a versatile toolkit. Meanwhile, the Progressive Force Continuum outlines a series of force levels but lacks the holistic approach to managing various resistance levels that Total Control Theory emphasizes.